Pandangan Masyarakat di Desa Powalutan tentang Demokrasi Politik Kekinian

Authors

  • Hana Indriani Burmias Universitas Negeri Manado Author
  • Romi Mesra Universitas Negeri Manado Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64924/a8d1y681

Keywords:

Demokrasi Lokal, Partisipasi Politik, Masyarakat Desa, Gotong Royong, Akuntabilitas Pemerintah

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pandangan masyarakat di Desa Powalutan tentang demokrasi politik kekinian, mencakup pemahaman mereka tentang konsep demokrasi, pentingnya demokrasi dalam kehidupan, dan praktik demokrasi sehari-hari. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi dan wawancara mendalam terhadap warga masyarakat desa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat memahami demokrasi sebagai sistem partisipasi rakyat melalui pemilihan wakil rakyat secara bebas, akuntabilitas pemerintah kepada rakyat, dan kebebasan mengemukakan pendapat. Masyarakat menilai demokrasi penting untuk mengontrol pemerintah dan menjamin pemerintahan yang bersih. Praktik demokrasi diwujudkan melalui partisipasi dalam kegiatan kemasyarakatan, menjaga ketertiban dan keamanan, serta gotong royong yang mengintegrasikan nilai tradisional dengan prinsip demokrasi modern. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa masyarakat Desa Powalutan telah menginternalisasi nilai-nilai demokrasi, meskipun masih terdapat kesenjangan antara harapan normatif dengan praktik politik riil yang memerlukan penguatan institusional dan pendidikan politik berkelanjutan.

References

Antlöv, H. (2003). Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193-214.

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Southeast Asia's troubling elections: Nondemocratic pluralism in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.

Bowen, J. R. (1986). On the political construction of tradition: Gotong royong in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Studies, 45(3), 545-561.

Buehler, M. (2009). The rising importance of personal networks in Indonesian local politics: An analysis of district government head elections in South Sulawesi in 2005. Decentralisation and regional autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and challenges, 101-124.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.

Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. Times Books.

Feith, H. (1962). The decline of constitutional democracy in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

Hatta, M. (1960). Demokrasi kita. Pandji Masjarakat.

Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 43.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Locke, J. (1690). Two treatises of government. Awnsham Churchill.

Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.

Nurhasim, M. (2003). Konflik dan integrasi politik Orde Baru. Lapera Pustaka Utama.

O'Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112-126.

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073-1087.

Pratikno. (2005). Desentralisasi pilihan yang tidak pernah final. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 9(2), 147-168.

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Sullivan, J. (1992). Local government and community in Java: An urban case-study. Oxford University Press.

Syarif Hidayat. (2007). Shadow state? Business and politics in the province of Banten. In H. Schulte Nordholt & G. van Klinken (Eds.), Renegotiating boundaries: Local politics in post-Suharto Indonesia (pp. 203-224). KITLV Press.

Tocqueville, A. de. (1835). Democracy in America. Saunders and Otley.

Tornquist, O. (2013). Assessing dynamics of democratisation: Transformative politics, new institutions, and the case of Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan.

World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. World Bank.

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Burmias, H. I., & Mesra, R. (2025). Pandangan Masyarakat di Desa Powalutan tentang Demokrasi Politik Kekinian. ETIC (EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL), 2(4), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.64924/a8d1y681