Pandangan Masyarakat Terhadap Demokrasi Saat Ini yang Terjadi di Lingkungan Desa Poopo Barat, Kecamatan Ranoyapo, Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64924/208p0r10Keywords:
Demokrasi Lokal, Partisipasi Masyarakat, Desa, Budaya Politik, Minahasa SelatanAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pandangan masyarakat Desa Poopo Barat, Kecamatan Ranoyapo, Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan terhadap demokrasi yang terjadi di lingkungan mereka. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi dan wawancara mendalam terhadap warga masyarakat yang dipilih secara purposive. Analisis data dilakukan dengan teknik deskriptif kualitatif model Miles dan Huberman meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat Desa Poopo Barat memiliki pandangan positif terhadap demokrasi dan telah menginternalisasi nilai-nilai demokrasi dalam kehidupan sosial sehari-hari melalui tradisi gotong royong dan musyawarah. Masyarakat menunjukkan toleransi politik yang tinggi dan kemampuan mengelola perbedaan secara konstruktif. Pemerintahan desa yang demokratis telah berhasil menciptakan stabilitas dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Masyarakat memiliki harapan besar agar demokrasi terus berkelanjutan melalui komitmen bersama dan penanaman nilai demokrasi kepada generasi muda. Integrasi nilai demokrasi modern dengan kearifan lokal Minahasa menjadi kekuatan dalam keberlanjutan demokrasi di tingkat desa.
References
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Antlov, H. (2003). Village Government and Rural Development in Indonesia: The New Democratic Framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193-214.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. Singapore: NUS Press.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Pearson.
Booth, J. A., & Seligson, M. A. (2009). The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (2001). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217-234.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Leftwich, A. (1993). Governance, Democracy and Development in the Third World. Third World Quarterly, 14(3), 605-624.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Manor, J. (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington DC: World Bank.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Donnell, G. (1996). Illusions About Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 34-51.
Pratikno. (2005). Exercising Freedom: Local Autonomy and Democracy in Indonesia. In M. Erb, P. Sulistiyanto, & C. Faucher (Eds.), Regionalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia (pp. 21-35). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Savirani, A., & Tornquist, O. (2015). Reclaiming the State: Overcoming Problems of Democracy in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PolGov & PCD Press.
Schedler, A. (1998). What is Democratic Consolidation? Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 91-107.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutiyo, & Maharjan, K. L. (2017). Decentralization and Rural Development in Indonesia. Singapore: Springer.
Tocqueville, A. de. (2000). Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (2002). Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vel, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and Village Governance in Indonesia: The Return to the Nagari and the 2014 Village Law. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493-507.
Warburton, E. (2016). Resource Nationalism in Post-Boom Indonesia: The New Normal? In S. Mietzner (Ed.), Democracy and Islam in Indonesia (pp. 66-89). London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ETIC (EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.