Pelibatan Politik Masyarakat dan Sikap Tentang Demokrasi terhadap Toleransi Politik di Desa Powalutan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64924/2qqzg103Keywords:
Pelibatan Politik, Masyarakat, Sikap Demokrasi, Toleransi PolitikAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan antara pelibatan politik masyarakat dan sikap tentang demokrasi terhadap toleransi politik di Desa Powalutan. Toleransi politik merupakan elemen fundamental demokrasi yang memungkinkan keberagaman pandangan hidup berdampingan, namun menghadapi tantangan serius di tingkat lokal akibat polarisasi dan mobilisasi identitas dalam kompetisi politik. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik wawancara mendalam terhadap informan kunci yang dipilih secara purposif, termasuk tokoh masyarakat dan calon legislatif. Analisis data dilakukan dengan teknik analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi pola dan tema utama terkait pelibatan politik, sikap demokrasi, dan toleransi politik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelibatan politik melalui strategi komunikasi persuasif dan karakteristik personal positif kandidat dapat membangun toleransi ketika menekankan prinsip tidak saling menjatuhkan. Politik memiliki pengaruh pervasif terhadap kehidupan sehari, hari dan pemilihan kepala desa menjadi momen krusial yang seringkali menimbulkan gesekan antar kelompok, sehingga memerlukan pendewasaan politik masyarakat melalui penanaman sikap dewasa dan pemahaman tentang politik santun dan etis. Integrasi norma sosial lokal dengan praktik demokratis, terutama nilai kebersamaan dan kekeluargaan, menjadi strategi penting dalam membangun toleransi politik yang kontekstual dan berkelanjutan di tingkat desa.
References
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
Antlov, H. (2003). Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193, 214.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bourchier, D. (2015). Illiberal democracy in Indonesia: The ideology of the family state. Routledge.
Bowen, J. R. (1986). On the political construction of tradition: Gotong royong in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Studies, 45(3), 545, 561.
Boyd, R. (2006). The value of civility? Urban Studies, 43(5, 6), 863, 878.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77, 101.
Chandra, K. (2004). Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic head counts in India. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76, 98.
Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. Fontana Press.
Forst, R. (2012). Toleration in conflict: Past and present. Cambridge University Press.
Galston, W. A. (1991). Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state. Cambridge University Press.
Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate, level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637, 663.
Gibson, J. L. (2006). Enigmas of intolerance: Fifty years after Stouffer's communism, conformity, and civil liberties. Perspectives on Politics, 4(1), 21, 34.
Gibson, J. L., & Gouws, A. (2003). Overcoming intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in democratic persuasion. Cambridge University Press.
Grugel, J. (2002). Democratization: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamid, A. (2013). Pemilihan kepala daerah (pilkada) tanpa partai politik (studi kasus Pilkada Kabupaten Bone tahun 2008). Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(1), 13, 30.
Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Temple University Press.
Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
Hyman, H. H. (1959). Political socialization: A study in the psychology of political behavior. Free Press.
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton University Press.
Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.). (2007). Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. Yale University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. Basic Books.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211, 239). Oxford University Press.
Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss, Morse, E., & Wood, S. L. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge University Press.
Muhtadi, B. (2019). Voting behavior in Indonesia: Parties, candidates, and the 2014 elections. Routledge.
Mujani, S., & Liddle, R. W. (2009). Muslim Indonesia's secular democracy. Asian Survey, 49(4), 575, 590.
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., Kennedy, R. P., Lazer, D. M., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who wants to deliberate—and why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 566, 583.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Peffley, M., & Rohrschneider, R. (2003). Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multi, level model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 243, 257.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Shils, E. (1997). The virtue of civility: Selected essays on liberalism, tradition, and civil society. Liberty Fund.
Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. (2004). The roots of social capital: Attitudinal and network mechanisms in the relation between youth and adult indicators of social capital. Acta Politica, 39(4), 422, 441.
Sullivan, J. L., & Transue, J. E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 625, 650.
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
Thompson, S., & Hoggett, P. (2001). The emotional dynamics of deliberative democracy. Policy & Politics, 29(3), 351, 364.
Tocqueville, A. de. (2000). Democracy in America (H. C. Mansfield & D. Winthrop, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1835)
Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
Wilkinson, S. I. (2004). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge University Press.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ETIC (EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
