Philosophy of Education and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Education Policy in Indonesia and Japan in Preparing the Future Generation
Keywords:
Philosophy of Education Innovation, A Comparative Study, Education Policy, Indonesia and Japan, Future GenerationAbstract
This comparative study examines the educational philosophies, structural frameworks, and innovative approaches of Indonesia and Japan in preparing future generations for global challenges. Utilizing a mixed-method comparative analysis, the research investigates the philosophical foundations, national education policies, and technological transformations in both countries' educational systems. Through comprehensive literature review and theoretical analysis, the study explores how Indonesia and Japan address multiculturalism, social integration, and technological advancement in education. The research reveals fundamental differences in educational approaches: Japan emphasizes collectivity, discipline, and technological innovation, while Indonesia focuses on multicultural tolerance and adaptive learning strategies. Key findings highlight Japan's highly standardized, technology-driven educational model contrasted with Indonesia's more flexible, diversity-oriented approach. The study recommends strategic integration of technological skills, cultural sensitivity, and adaptive learning methodologies to enhance educational effectiveness. These insights provide crucial perspectives on educational development in diverse societal contexts, offering valuable implications for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders in preparing future generations for complex global landscapes.
References
Banks, J. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19(1), 3-49.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the networked society. Blackwell Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the 'digital divide' to 'digital inequality': Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1925). Education and sociology. Free Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29(4), 297-318.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Ragin, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Saito, T. (2019). Comparative studies of education systems in East Asia. International Journal of Educational Research.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the public sector. W. W. Norton & Company.
Suryadarma, D. (2012). Education in Indonesia. SMERU Research Institute.
van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IEDUST: International Journal of Educational Sciences and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
